How Policy and Advocacy Shape Substance Use Treatment and Prevention
Substance use treatment and prevention in the United States are influenced by policy and advocacy. These two elements work together to determine how services get funded, who has access to them, and how they are provided. Without effective policies and advocates, many people with substance use disorders (SUDs) would struggle even more to find help.
Funding and Services
Government policies at the federal, state, and local levels play an important role in establishing funding sources, setting care standards, and increasing access to treatment and prevention programs. For example, State Opioid Response (SOR) grants give money directly to states to support various services, including medication-assisted treatment, overdose prevention, and recovery support programs1. These grants have helped distribute hundreds of thousands of naloxone kits, saving many lives.
Other policies, such as the Support for Patients and Communities Act passed in 2018, tackle barriers to care2. This bipartisan law expanded access to substance use treatment through Medicaid and Medicare, making it easier for residential treatment centers to receive federal funding. It also requires all state Children’s Health Insurance Programs to cover mental health and substance use services for children and pregnant women, ensuring fair access to care.3
Expanding Prevention Efforts
Policy also shapes prevention strategies by funding education, outreach, and early intervention programs. Federal block grants, like the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant, let states invest in prevention efforts that match their communities’ needs.4 These policies support school programs, community awareness campaigns, and initiatives that aim to reduce risks for youth and vulnerable populations.
Advocacy: The Voice for Change
While policy sets the groundwork, advocacy drives those policies. Advocacy groups, made up of families, healthcare professionals, and community leaders, work to raise awareness and push for changes in laws and regulations. They engage with lawmakers, showing them the real impact of substance use and the urgent need for comprehensive solutions.
For example, strong advocacy from mental health and substance use organizations led to the creation of the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline in 2022. This policy change established a simple, nationwide number for individuals in crisis to reach trained counselors for support with suicide prevention and substance use and mental health crises.
The Future of Advocacy
As substance use issues continue to evolve, ongoing advocacy will be crucial in ensuring that policies adapt to new challenges, such as the increase in fentanyl-related overdoses and the need for culturally sensitive care. To create communities that are free from preventable overdoses, collective action is essential. Incorporating Zero Overdose Safety Planning into primary prevention strategies will support these efforts. By equipping healthcare professionals and community members with the knowledge to implement a Zero Overdose Safety Plan for those in need, we can take significant steps toward reducing overdose incidents.
- Impact of State Targeted Response & State Opioid Response Grants. (2022). https://nasadad.org/opioid-state-targeted-response-map ↩︎
- SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act 115th Congress (2017 … (2018). https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6 ↩︎
- Topic: CHIP – MACPAC. (2024). https://www.macpac.gov/topic/chip/ ↩︎
- Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) Block Grant. (n.d.). https://nasadad.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SAPT-Block-Grant-Fact-Sheet-Feb.-2021-FINAL.pdf
↩︎